Omega Nebula, M17

NGC 6618 in the Constellation of Sagittarius

Image exposure:
120 minutes
Image field of view:
91.1 x 59.7 arcminutes
Image date:
2021-08-12

The suburban night sky was clear and beautiful but I was the only person around to witness the dazzlingly brilliant Venus sinking down to the Western horizon, closely pursued by a growing crescent Moon. No people outside. No cars. No dogs barking. No noise at all. Another lock-down night and what was to be my last observing night before moving my telescope from my favourite viewing spot in the front garden into the seclusion of the back garden. Just me, the sky and and that pesky street light* (See below).

My target for the evening was Messier 17, crossing the meridian, high in the sky. The nebula is located in a rich Milky Way star field.

M17 is a bright red HII emission nebula, taken with a narrowband Ha and [OIII] filter to accentuate the contrast. All light is blocked by the filter, apart from the hydrogen and oxygen emissions of the glowing gas, caused by the high intensity ultra-violet light pouring away from the new born stars recently formed within.

Inside the nebula are about thirty-five young stars, 20-30 times brighter than the Sun but not visible at optical wavelengths. They will ultimately emerge as an open star cluster after the intense UV light erodes the gaseous nebula.

As with many astronomical objects, the Omega Nebula is listed by different sources as being at various distances. In this case, between 4,200 and 6,000 light years. It spans around 40 light years.

We do know that its brightness is magnitude +6.0 and its apparent diameter is 46′ x 37′.

My understanding is that the name Omega came about because of its distorted resemblance to the Greek letter Ω. It is also known by several other names, including: Checkmark Nebula, Horseshoe Nebula, Lobster Nebula, and the Swan Nebula.

Sagittarius
Image Source: Wikimedia Commons

nova.astrometry.net

Warning: Soapbox alert!!

That e @#$%^&!! Street Light

I’ve mentioned the street light quite a number of times in my blogs, most notably > here < and > here <.

My New Enemy, the new street light, unnecessarily bright on an unnecessarily taller pole. It should have been designed to just illuminate the street but – being without any shrouding – also illuminates all the properties in the street as well. 50mm fixed lens, f/2.2, ISO 100, 1.3 second exposure. (2019-11-14).

To summarise, in 2019 they raised the height of the column, so it spread the light more widely and they replaced the metal-halide lantern with a much brighter LED fitting with no glare control, also spreading more widely. Not downwards but sideways. ☹

I had no astronomical grounds to complain about the shockingly bright glare from the light. After all, if I set up my telescope near the street, then I should expect street lighting interference. However, the light shone at almost eye-level as either my Bride or I stepped outside the front door. It also shone horizontally into my neighbours windows and would have shone into ours too if we didn’t have roller shutters.

I had already built myself a portable glare control screen to protect my telescope from the bright light, so my application to Council was only concerned with the blinding glare at the front door.

Many months and several e-mails later, the light was finally modified and the glare was considerably reduced (but not eliminated), making it somewhat safer for us to walk out the front door. 😄

It took them less than five minutes to do it, just a few days ago – just after I had relocated the telescope to the back!

Good Street Lighting Design

Here’s a simplistic guide to Good Street Lighting Design Practice. Only the last of the four options below complies with Australian Standards. It saves wasted light, it saves energy, it saves $$$$$, it stops glare, it’s less intrusive, it lessens confusion for bird-life and is safer for humans. Lastly, it helps preserve the night sky.

If I were an Electrical Design Engineer

Actually I am an electrical design engineer.

I would not have lasted very long if I took on the job of street lighting design for local councils.

After all, I would have wanted to design every job properly. I would not have wanted to specify cheap lighting fixtures which contravene the Australian Standards and irritated the ratepayers with excessive glare and light spillage on their property.

Which is what happens everywhere around here.

Rant over.

Thanks for reading!

Cosmic Focus Observatory

Above us only sky….

Telescope:SkyWatcher Esprit 120 mm apochromatic 3-element refractor; 840 mm f/l @ f/7.
Optics:Field flattener; ZWO duo narrowband Ha + [OIII] filter.
Mount & Guiding:SkyWatcher EQ6-R Pro mount.
Imaging camera:ZWO ASI 071 MC cooled.

Images © Roger Powell
Cosmic Focus Observatory, 34° S
I’m a founder member of Macarthur Astronomical Society and current webmaster.

🙃

18 Comments

  1. That is a lovely view of M17. I should be able to see it from here if I drive away from my own bright street light. Thanks for that rant. LED lamps are cheaper to run long term resulting in more of them being installed.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Probably more, yes but also emitting more light per fitting than is necessary. Some of the running
      costs saved could be spent on street lights fitted with diffusers having proper dispersion control…..

      Like

  2. Never done, but often thought …pointing a (tripod mounted) laser flashlight beam at the streetlight’s sensor during observation periods. Comments??? Nice, really nice image of M 17. M 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yes, I have seen YouTube videos about it and I have often thought about trying it one day.
      Alas, I don’t own a laser pointer and don’t need one for astronomy. The legislation here is in Oz is very strict on ownership of these devices.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. You can’t fool me!

    … this is just an upside-down photo of the Prawn Nebula.

    You’d hate me as a neighbor . . . got me nice bright lights all around the house; it keeps marauders away.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes I can.

      No it’s not. I see no prawns.

      I probably would, at night. I might throw stuff at your wretched lights or complain to the local council. Maybe I’d call the SWAT team too.

      Are marauders kept away by lighting or is the lighting useful to them? The jury is out.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Well, I’m the kind of neighbor that — if you asked me — would gladly turn off the light while you’re out there imaging.

        As per all the available evidence — such as a complete absence of marauders — the lights are doing their job and keeping them away.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Wow thank you for the info about street lights, no wonder I love blackouts ☺️ Your emails are fabulous, have enjoyed them for years, stay safe in this crazy lockdown in our humble LGA. Nea

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Bad lighting is a major problem everywhere. Here in Las Cruces the town went with the cheap solution and with the huge population growth and construction etc the light dome expanded from about 35 degrees altitude to 65 in just 5 years. We had a couple houses in the neighborhood that were without occupants either for sale or whatever but they still kept their nasty security lights on! I finally had to go over there and cover them with foil (when no one was looking) . Maybe you can do that with your light issue? 🙂
    Dave

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You’re right, Dave. Bad street lighting everywhere. Bad security lighting everywhere too.

      I’ve spoken with a senior lighting engineer for our regional street lighting about the direct glare from street lights (as a concerned resident, not as an astronomer). He did not really want to talk about direct glare because I don’t think he understood it.

      Once they’ve selected a bad light, that’s what they put up – everywhere. 😟

      Like

    1. You don’t know Australian politicians. Many of them would call it a conspiracy. Some would say we need more covid in our lives to prevent autism and some would say we should wait until China acts first. Then there are those who would want to hear what their favourite radio talk back “personality” thinks about it.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. This image is just stunning! I’m glad you were able to capture the vivid color despite the awful streetlight. Ugh, I hate LED street lighting! The insane level of brightness actually makes it harder to see for me, and they are terrible for light pollution.

    Like

    1. Thank you Cer.

      Efficient LED lighting is our future but unfortunately it is being tragically misused. As you say, they are too bright in street lights and they never include direct glare reduction shielding when choosing a fixture. 😕

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment or ask a question . . . .

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s